Dispersion trading, rooted in the intricate dance of correlations among individual stocks and their indices, has steadily garnered attention from institutional investors and sophisticated traders alike. As financial markets evolve, so do the strategies employed to reap profits, and dispersion trading serves as a testament to this dynamism.

👉 Dispersion Trading is great, especially, when implemented (like pro quant traders and hedge funds) as algorithmic trading strategies:

If you are interested, here is a database of algo trading strategies developed by researchers 🔬: Equities, Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Currencies, Bonds, Options

At its core, dispersion trading is a hedged strategy that capitalizes on the mispricing between implied correlations of index options and the realized correlations of its constituents. In simpler terms, it's a bet on the divergence between the volatility of the index and the volatilities of its individual components. Given its reliance on correlations, it's no surprise that dispersion trading is often termed a "correlation play."

The significance of dispersion trading in contemporary financial markets cannot be overstated. As markets become more complex and integrated, understanding the intricacies of how assets move in relation to one another becomes paramount. Dispersion trading, with its focus on correlation dynamics, offers traders both a unique lens to view these movements and a mechanism to profit from them.

While it might seem esoteric to some, dispersion trading's prominence is bolstered by several factors. The strategy can act as a powerful tool for diversification, given that it doesn't necessarily rely on bullish or bearish market sentiments. Moreover, with the advent of advanced quantitative models and computational tools, executing dispersion trades has become more accessible to those beyond just the walls of large institutions.

Dispersion trading, at its essence, is a sophisticated volatility arbitrage strategy that capitalizes on the discrepancy between implied correlations of index options and the realized correlations of its individual components. To deconstruct this, think of it as betting on the variance of the index being different from the aggregated variances of its constituents. The strategy hinges on the belief that the market sometimes misprices the index options when compared to the sum of the options of its individual stocks.

Core principles underpinning dispersion trading include:

Shifting our focus to its inception, the roots of dispersion trading trace back to the 1980s and 1990s when advanced financial models began to flourish. The popularization of the Black-Scholes model, which laid the foundation for options pricing, played a pivotal role in the evolution of various arbitrage strategies, including dispersion trading.

However, it wasn't until the explosion of computational power in the late 1990s and early 2000s that dispersion trading truly came into its own. With the ability to handle complex calculations and process vast datasets, traders could now more effectively model and exploit the intricacies of correlations and volatilities across large indices.

Furthermore, the introduction and growth of index options markets, especially those like the S&P 500, provided the necessary infrastructure for these strategies to be executed on a significant scale. The 2008 financial crisis, marked by extreme market volatilities, further spotlighted the nuances of correlation dynamics and bolstered the relevance of dispersion trading as a hedged, non-directional strategy.

In recent years, with the ongoing evolution of quantitative finance and algorithmic trading, dispersion trading continues to evolve, adapting to the ever-changing market dynamics and offering traders an intriguing avenue to potentially harness inefficiencies in the market's perception of correlation and volatility.

Dispersion trading fundamentally revolves around the difference between implied correlations of index options and the realized correlations of its individual constituents. This intricate play between the index and its components relies heavily on the understanding of correlation, which is a measure of how two or more securities move in relation to each other.

Correlation values range between -1 and 1. A value of 1 signifies perfect positive correlation, meaning both securities move in the same direction. A value of -1 implies perfect negative correlation, where securities move in opposite directions. A correlation near 0 indicates that the movements of securities are largely independent of each other. In the context of dispersion trading, correlations are paramount because the strategy profits from the discrepancies in how correlations are priced in the market versus how they actually materialize.

A crucial perspective on dispersion trading is how it contrasts with another popular strategy: index arbitrage. Index arbitrage capitalizes on price differentials between an index and its underlying stocks. When there's a misalignment between the index's value and the combined values of its individual stocks, traders can buy the undervalued asset and sell the overvalued one, profiting from the eventual price convergence.

On the other hand, dispersion trading does not focus on price differences but on volatility discrepancies. Traders believe that the market's forecast of future correlation (implied in index options prices) will differ from actual realized correlation. When the implied correlation is high, a typical dispersion trade would involve selling index options (believing that the index volatility is overpriced) and buying individual stock options (betting on individual volatilities being underpriced). Conversely, when implied correlation is low, the trade directions are reversed.

To illustrate with a real-world example, consider a hypothetical situation involving the S&P 500 index. Suppose the implied volatility of S&P 500 options is notably high because of market uncertainties, while the implied volatilities of its constituent stocks are comparatively low. A trader who believes that this mispricing stems from an overestimation of future correlation might initiate a dispersion trade. They'd sell options on the S&P 500, predicting its volatility is overpriced, while simultaneously buying options on its individual stocks, betting that their volatilities are underpriced. If the future correlation turns out to be lower than what's implied in the prices, the trader stands to profit.

In essence, while both dispersion trading and index arbitrage exploit market inefficiencies, they focus on different aspects. Index arbitrage revolves around immediate price discrepancies, while dispersion trading delves into the deeper realms of volatility and correlation dynamics.

Dispersion trading thrives on the foundation of market inefficiencies specifically related to the correlation between an index and its constituents. These inefficiencies give rise to potential profit opportunities, making the strategy particularly appealing to quantitative and sophisticated traders. So, why do traders gravitate towards dispersion trading in lieu of other available strategies?

In essence, dispersion trading offers a unique blend of complexity, transparency, and efficiency. Its reliance on volatility and correlation mispricings, combined with its potential for profitability in diverse market conditions, makes it an enticing choice for traders keen on exploiting niche inefficiencies in the financial markets.

The United States, home to some of the world's most dynamic and liquid financial markets, offers a fertile ground for dispersion trading. As a dispersion trader, understanding the key indices and sectors is paramount, as these serve as the primary instruments for constructing trades. Here's a deep dive into the most pertinent U.S. indices and sectors:

Sector Indices: Beyond broad market indices, sector-specific indices allow traders to harness volatility and correlation within industry segments. Key sectors and their corresponding indices include:

Dispersion trading, at its core, seeks to exploit mispricings between an index and its constituents. By understanding the key U.S. indices and the sectors they encompass, traders can better position themselves to capitalize on arising opportunities. With the U.S. markets being a central hub of global financial activity, these indices and sectors provide ample scope for crafting effective dispersion trading strategies[1].

The trade lifecycle of a dispersion trade unfolds in a systematic sequence, similar to other complex trading strategies, yet with its unique nuances. Understanding this lifecycle ensures that traders can maximize profits while managing risks effectively.

1. Trade Initiation: Dispersion trading starts with the identification of a perceived mispricing between the index volatility and the combined volatilities of its components. A trader believes that individual stock volatilities (when combined) differ significantly from the index's implied volatility. Thus, they'll sell options on the index and buy options on its constituent stocks, or vice versa, depending on the perceived mispricing.

2. Position Monitoring: Once the trade is executed, constant monitoring is essential. This involves keeping tabs on the implied volatilities of both the index and its constituents. The relationship between these volatilities may change based on various factors, including market news, earnings reports, or macroeconomic data releases.

3. Margin and Capital Requirements: As with all trades involving options, it's crucial to ensure adequate capital and meet margin requirements. This is particularly true for dispersion trades, where multiple options (on individual stocks and the index) are involved. Adjustments might need to be made to positions based on changing margin requirements.

4. Trade Adjustments: If the observed mispricing starts to diminish, or if market conditions change, traders might need to adjust their positions. This can involve reducing exposure to certain stocks, increasing exposure to the index, or vice versa.

5. Profit-Loss Scenarios on Consecutive Trading Days:

Let's explore a basic profit-loss scenario for a dispersion trade:

Imagine a trader expects that the individual stock volatilities of the S&P 500 constituents are underestimated compared to the index's implied volatility. They decide to sell S&P 500 index options and buy options on its stocks.

Day 1: News about a tech breakthrough causes tech stocks to rally, increasing their volatility. However, the S&P 500 index's implied volatility remains relatively unchanged. The trader's position is now profitable, as the individual stock options they bought have increased in value more than the index options they sold.

Day 2: A broad market selloff occurs due to macroeconomic concerns. Both the individual stock volatilities and the index's implied volatility shoot up. However, since the rise in individual stock volatilities is more pronounced, the trader still stands to gain.

Day 3: The market stabilizes, and both stock and index volatilities revert to mean levels. The trader decides that the mispricing has mostly corrected and chooses to close the position for a profit.

6. Trade Exit/Closure: When the mispricing is believed to have corrected or if the trade hits a pre-defined risk parameter (like a stop-loss level), it's time to exit. This involves unwinding all the positions—buying back the sold options and selling the purchased ones.

Dispersion trading, with its intricate web of options and constant need for adjustments, requires a keen understanding of both the broader market and individual stock movements. Proficiently navigating the trade lifecycle ensures that traders can exploit mispricings while adeptly managing risks[2].

Correlation is the statistical measure of how two securities move concerning each other. In the context of dispersion trading, correlation matters immensely because the strategy inherently capitalizes on the discrepancies between implied correlations (as suggested by index options) and realized correlations (as observed among individual stock components).

The concept of "Intrinsic Value Hedge" is pivotal here. It refers to the idea that by holding a basket of stocks that replicates an index, and simultaneously holding options on that index, a trader can hedge out some of the risk due to changes in the intrinsic value of the options. This intrinsic value hedge works perfectly when stocks move in perfect correlation with the index. However, when individual stock components are not perfectly correlated with the index, this hedge might be imperfect, leading to potential risks and rewards.

Now, let's delve deeper into the real-world consequences of imperfect correlations:

Correlation dynamics, thus, form the backbone of dispersion trading. Accurately gauging and positioning for changes in these correlations can mean the difference between profitability and loss. As the financial landscape evolves and markets become more interconnected, understanding the nuances of correlation becomes ever more crucial for the astute dispersion trader.

Options play a central role in dispersion trading, giving traders the ability to capitalize on discrepancies between implied and realized volatilities of an index and its constituent stocks. By understanding the nuances of various option greeks, traders can manage and optimize their dispersion trades.

Equal-Delta Options in Dispersion Trading

"Equal-delta" options are those that have an equal absolute delta value but opposite signs. For instance, an equal-delta straddle consists of a long call and a long put option, both with the same absolute delta value[4]. In the context of dispersion trading, these options are instrumental. When a trader expects the implied correlation of index options to be higher than the realized correlation of its constituent stocks, they can sell equal-delta options on the index and buy the options on its components, or vice versa, depending on the mispricing detected.

Impact of Gamma on Index Options and Dispersion Trades

Gamma represents the rate of change of an option's delta with respect to the underlying asset's price. In dispersion trading, understanding Gamma is essential because it affects the sensitivity of the option position to price changes in the underlying asset. An increase in Gamma makes a dispersion trade more responsive to small movements in the underlying asset. It's noteworthy that at-the-money options tend to have the highest Gamma, which can lead to rapid profit or loss as the underlying moves[5]. Hence, monitoring and managing Gamma exposure is essential to ensure the trade doesn't become disproportionately sensitive to market movements.

Understanding Vega Risk in Dispersion Trading

Vega measures the sensitivity of an option's price to changes in implied volatility. In dispersion trading, Vega risk can be thought of as the risk associated with an unexpected change in the implied volatility of the index or its components. A positive Vega indicates that the option's price would benefit from an increase in implied volatility, while a negative Vega suggests the opposite.

In a typical dispersion trade, the Vega risk might not be evenly distributed. For instance, if the index options have a higher implied volatility than the constituent stocks' options, selling the index options and buying the individual stock options could result in a net positive Vega position. This means the trade would profit from an increase in implied volatility[6].

For traders, it's crucial to assess and manage Vega risk continuously. Any misjudgment can lead to unintended exposure, potentially affecting the trade's profitability.

In conclusion, options and their associated greeks are the lifeblood of dispersion trading. Mastery over their intricacies not only enables traders to exploit mispricings more effectively but also to manage and hedge associated risks proficiently.

Dispersion trading, though potentially profitable, is not without risks. Understanding these risks and employing strategies to manage them is essential for both novice and experienced traders.

Market/Volatility Risk

Volatility, a measure of price variation in a given timeframe, plays a pivotal role in dispersion trading. When the market's expected volatility (implied volatility) differs from the volatility realized over time, it can affect the profitability of a dispersion trade. For instance, if implied volatility is higher than realized volatility, selling index options and buying individual stock options can be profitable. However, should market conditions change and implied volatilities adjust, this could render a once-profitable strategy unviable[7]. To manage this, traders often use dynamic hedging techniques and monitor the volatility surface closely.

Correlation Sensitivity

Correlation sensitivity, often termed "correlation risk," arises when the assumed correlation between the index and its constituents changes. Dispersion trades thrive on the difference between implied and realized correlation. Any unexpected movement in these correlations can dramatically impact the trade's performance[8]. For instance, if all stocks in an index rise simultaneously due to macroeconomic news, the assumed dispersion can decrease, affecting the profitability.

Introducing "Rega"

"Rega" is a term that denotes the sensitivity of a trade's profit and loss to changes in correlation. In essence, it's the "correlation gamma" and can be thought of as the rate of change of a trade's vega with respect to correlation changes. Just as vega measures sensitivity to volatility changes, rega gives traders insight into how sensitive their position is to shifts in correlation.

To compute rega for a portfolio, one could use the following formula:

$\text{Rega} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial \rho^2}$

Where $V$ represents the portfolio's value and $\rho$ is the correlation coefficient.

Monitoring rega is crucial for traders. A high positive rega implies that the trade stands to gain from an increase in correlation, whereas a negative rega suggests the opposite. Regularly assessing and adjusting one's position to manage rega ensures the trade doesn't become excessively exposed to sudden correlation shifts.

In the realm of dispersion trading, risks are inherent. However, by understanding and actively managing factors like market volatility, correlation sensitivity, and rega, traders can better navigate the complex landscapes of modern financial markets.

Dispersion trading, being inherently quantitative, leans heavily on statistical methods for both understanding and optimization. Traders often rely on various statistical measures to gauge the effectiveness of their trades and to predict future movements.

Implied versus Realized Correlation

The heart of dispersion trading lies in the difference between implied and realized correlations. Traders often analyze historical data to gauge the typical spread between these two measures. A widening spread indicates potential for profit, assuming the trader believes that implied and realized correlations will converge.

Volatility Forecasting

Statistical models, including GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) and its variations, are widely employed to forecast volatility. Such models can predict the conditional variance of returns, a critical component in determining option prices[9]. By accurately forecasting volatility, traders can better predict the pricing of both index and individual stock options.

Mean Reversion Analysis

Many traders believe that implied correlation levels are mean-reverting. To test this hypothesis, traders can use statistical tools like the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test or the Hurst Exponent. If indeed implied correlations are found to be mean-reverting, it strengthens the case for dispersion trading, as traders can capitalize on deviations from the mean.

Multivariate Regression Analysis

Given that dispersion trading involves multiple assets, multivariate regression can be employed to understand the relationship between an index and its constituents. Such an analysis can provide insights into how individual stocks might behave given a particular movement in the index.

Backtesting

Any trading strategy, including dispersion trading, benefits from robust backtesting. Using historical data, traders can simulate their dispersion trading strategies to understand their effectiveness in past market conditions. Statistical measures like the Sharpe Ratio, Maximum Drawdown, and Compound Annual Growth Rate can be derived from backtesting to gauge the potential risk and return of the strategy[10].

While statistics play a pivotal role in understanding and optimizing dispersion trades, they also serve as a reminder of the inherent risks. Past performance is not always indicative of future results, and statistical measures are mere tools, not guarantees. However, armed with these tools, a diligent trader can navigate the complex world of dispersion trading with greater confidence and clarity.

Volatility skew, often referred to as the "smile", arises when options of the same underlying asset but different strike prices exhibit different implied volatilities. This skewness is a critical component for dispersion traders, and understanding how to model and generate signals from it can unlock more sophisticated trading strategies[11].

Volatility Skew and Its Origins

The Black-Scholes model, a cornerstone in option pricing, assumes that volatility remains constant across strike prices. However, in reality, deep out-of-the-money (OTM) puts often have higher implied volatilities than at-the-money (ATM) options or out-of-the-money calls. This inconsistency is largely attributed to the demand for downside protection and market crashes, which tend to move faster and deeper than rallies[12].

Signal Generation from Skew

Modeling Volatility Skew

To model the volatility skew, traders often use the SABR model or variants of the stochastic volatility model[^20^]. These models allow for skewness and can be calibrated to market data:

$\sigma(T,K) = \frac{\alpha}{(1-T\beta)^{\frac{1-\beta}{2}}}\left[ 1 + \rho\zeta\omega + \frac{(2-3\rho^2)\zeta^2}{2} \right]$

Where:

Modeling skew with such models provides a more nuanced understanding of market dynamics and allows traders to price options more accurately.

Using Machine Learning for Signal Enhancement

Modern traders also incorporate machine learning techniques to enhance signal quality. Neural networks or support vector machines can be trained on historical data, capturing complex non-linear relationships in volatility surfaces that traditional models might miss[13].

In summary, the volatility skew offers dispersion traders an additional dimension of analysis and opportunity. Proper modeling and signal generation from the skew can lead to better-informed trades and potentially higher returns.

The Morgan Stanley High-Technology 35 Index (MSH) is a capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the U.S. high-tech market segment, comprising 35 prominent tech companies. Being a leading representation of the tech industry's health, the MSH presents traders with various opportunities, especially for dispersion trading.

MSH's Composition and Dynamics

Comprising tech giants, the MSH has companies with substantial market capitalizations and varying degrees of volatility. For instance, companies like Apple or Microsoft, with vast market caps, might demonstrate lower volatilities compared to smaller constituents. This difference in volatilities and correlations forms the crux of dispersion opportunities.

Challenges in Trading MSH

Solutions and Strategies

Benefits of Dispersion Trading with MSH

In essence, the Morgan Stanley High-Technology 35 Index, while presenting challenges, offers dispersion traders a rich playground. The key lies in understanding the index's nuances, adapting strategies accordingly, and leveraging the inherent volatility and correlation dynamics to one's advantage.

Dispersion trading, initially prevalent among institutional traders, has expanded its horizon over the years. With technological advancements and an increase in quantitative trading approaches, the strategy is now more accessible to retail traders as well. Here's a snapshot of its current state in global markets and the evolving challenges and opportunities:

Current State in Global Markets:

Challenges in the Modern Landscape:

Opportunities Ahead:

In sum, dispersion trading continues to evolve, reflecting the broader shifts in global financial markets. By staying abreast of these changes and adapting strategies accordingly, traders can harness the potential of this niche trading approach in today's dynamic world.

For aspiring and seasoned traders alike, a pivotal question often arises: "How much capital do I need to initiate and manage dispersion trades effectively?" This is especially pertinent given the complexity and multi-legged nature of dispersion strategies. Let's delve into the factors and calculations necessary to determine the capital requirements.

Number of Stocks in the Index

The capital requirement increases with the number of stocks in the index. For instance, trading an index with 50 stocks necessitates positions in 50 individual stock options and one index option.

Margin Requirements

Each position within a dispersion trade will carry its own margin requirement. Traders must ensure they have enough capital to cover the sum of margins for all positions.

Desired Portfolio Exposure

Determine the net exposure you're targeting. This should be based on risk tolerance, investment horizon, and trading objectives. Remember, higher exposure may yield higher returns but comes with increased risk.

Option Premiums

The cost of buying options can vary significantly based on factors like volatility and time to expiration. Ensure you account for these premiums when calculating capital requirements.

Additional Capital Buffer

It's prudent to keep additional capital as a buffer for unexpected market movements or margin calls.

To provide a simple estimation of capital requirement, consider this formula:

$\text{Capital Requirement} = (N \times \text{Average Stock Option Margin} + \text{Index Option Margin}) \times (1 + \text{Buffer Percentage}) + N \times \text{Average Option Premium}$

Where:

For example, if trading an index with 20 stocks, where the average stock option margin is $1,000, the index option margin is $5,000, the buffer is 20%, and the average option premium is $50:

$\text{Capital Requirement} = (20 \times \$1,000 + \$5,000) \times 1.20 + 20 \times \$50$

$\text{Capital Requirement} = \$29,000$

This indicates a trader would ideally need $29,000 to engage in dispersion trading for this specific scenario[14].

It's important to note that these are generalized estimates. The precise capital requirement can vary based on brokerage, regional regulations, market conditions, and individual trader choices. Engaging with a financial advisor or risk management expert can provide tailored insights.

Dispersion trading, with its emphasis on understanding and exploiting the relationship between individual stock volatilities and index volatilities, offers principles that can be applied beyond its niche context. By taking a closer look, one can see how these foundational concepts have broader applications in the world of finance and trading.

Diversification and Risk Management

The very essence of dispersion trading is based on the belief that there's a mispricing between an index's implied volatility and the aggregate implied volatility of its constituents. This concept can be extended to portfolio management, where understanding correlations and diversifications between assets can lead to optimized risk-reward profiles.

Arbitrage Opportunities

Dispersion trading is, at its core, a form of volatility arbitrage. Similar principles can be applied to identify and exploit arbitrage opportunities in other areas, such as interest rate arbitrage, triangular arbitrage in forex, or even statistical arbitrage in equities.

Understanding of Correlation Dynamics

The importance of correlations in dispersion trading can be extended to other trading strategies. For instance, pairs trading, where two historically correlated assets are traded in conjunction when they diverge from their historical relationship, is rooted in understanding and banking on correlation dynamics.

Options Strategy Beyond Dispersion

The use of options in dispersion trading provides traders with a deep understanding of options strategies. This knowledge can be transferred to employ other sophisticated strategies like straddles, strangles, iron condors, and butterflies in varying market conditions.

Behavioral Finance Insights

One reason dispersion trading opportunities exist is due to behavioral biases of market participants. Recognizing these biases, such as the tendency to overprice index options during times of uncertainty, can offer valuable insights when evaluating other market anomalies or mispricings.

Application in Structured Products

Banks and financial institutions often create structured products that have payoffs dependent on the performance of an index relative to its constituents. The principles of dispersion trading can guide the design and pricing of these products.

Lessons for Algorithmic and Quantitative Trading

Dispersion trading, given its quantitative nature, offers insights into algorithmic trading. The use of statistical tools to understand and exploit volatility discrepancies can be a foundational lesson for quants looking to develop algorithms in other trading domains.

In summary, while dispersion trading is a specific strategy focused on volatility mispricings between indices and their constituents, the principles underpinning it—understanding correlations, exploiting arbitrage opportunities, leveraging options strategies, and recognizing behavioral biases—have broad applications in the world of finance. As traders and financial professionals grow their expertise in dispersion trading, they'll find that its lessons provide valuable tools and insights applicable far beyond this specific strategy.

Dispersion trading, as delved into throughout this guide, stands as a nuanced and intricate strategy rooted in understanding the dynamics between index volatilities and the volatilities of its individual constituents. While appearing complex at first, the potential opportunities it presents are significant, especially for those who have a firm grasp of correlation dynamics, options strategies, and market behavior.

Central to its appeal is its foundation in exploiting perceived mispricings between implied volatilities of indices and their individual stocks. This strategy thrives in both stable markets and during times of economic tumult, offering traders avenues to generate returns that are often uncorrelated with broader market movements.

However, it's worth noting that as with any trading strategy, success in dispersion trading requires a deep understanding of its mechanics, a meticulous approach to risk management, and continuous learning to navigate evolving market conditions.

For those intrigued by the intricacies of dispersion trading, this guide serves as just the starting point. The financial world is vast, and continuous exploration, combined with practical experience, will serve as the best teachers. In the rapidly changing landscape of financial markets, staying curious, adaptable, and informed is more valuable than ever.

💡 Read more:

[1]: S&P U.S. Indices Methodology - S&P Dow Jones Indices.

[2]: Volatility Dispersion Trading - Q. Deng, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

[3]: Volatility and Correlation: The Perfect Hedger and the Fox - Riccardo Rebonato.

[4]: Option Volatility & Pricing: Advanced Trading Strategies and Techniques - Sheldon Natenberg.

[5]: Trading Options Greeks: How Time, Volatility, and Other Pricing Factors Drive Profits - Dan Passarelli.

[6]: Dynamic Hedging: Managing Vanilla and Exotic Options - Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

[7]: Volatility Trading - Euan Sinclair.

[8]: The Concepts and Practice of Mathematical Finance - Mark S. Joshi.

[9]: Analysis of Financial Time Series - Ruey S. Tsay.

[10]: Quantitative Trading: How to Build Your Own Algorithmic Trading Business - Chan, E.P.

[11]: Option Volatility and Pricing - Sheldon Natenberg.

[12]: Understanding Volatility Smile - Investopedia.

[13]: Advances in Financial Machine Learning - Marcos Lopez de Prado.

[14]: Margin Requirements for Option Writers - Investopedia.